Sixty Days to Close: Uniting Strategy and Accounting

Home » Insights » Sixty Days to Close: Uniting Strategy and Accounting

The call comes on a Thursday afternoon. A letter of intent has been signed. The deal closes in 60 days — and your company’s accounting team has never navigated recording or integrating a strategic acquisition or joint venture.

At that point, the pressure is not only technical. Management is balancing legal deadlines, financing requirements, integration planning, board expectations and auditor questions. A small accounting delay can become a transaction delay.

In the first two articles of this series, we described the chief accounting officer (CAO) role and the routine accounting infrastructure that forms its foundation (accounting memos, policies and controls). Strategic transaction accounting is where that foundation is tested.

This article focuses on four areas of strategic transaction accounting: day-one accounting, purchase price allocation, 12-month post-transaction review and accounting integration. We share some thoughts about artificial intelligence and change management in the context of strategic events. We end with a reminder about the importance of a strong accounting infrastructure and the CAO role in reinforcing that strength.

1. Day-One Accounting Advisory

The starting point for any acquisition or joint venture formation is the transition from the target’s closing balance sheet to the combined entity’s opening balance sheet. This is not a simple roll-forward. It requires confirming the accuracy and completeness of the target’s closing balances, crosswalking them to the acquirer’s chart of accounts, reviewing the purchase price allocation and recording the acquisition in accordance with the applicable guidance.

A threshold question is whether the acquired set constitutes a business or merely a group of assets.

• Business: If the acquisition is determined to be a business, all identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed must be recognized at fair value. Intangible assets must be separately identified, goodwill must be calculated and any contingent consideration must be appropriately classified and measured.
• Asset Acquisition: In an asset acquisition, goodwill is not recognized. Transaction costs are capitalized rather than expensed and the purchase price is allocated based on relative fair values.

An incorrect determination can result in a material misstatement of the financial statements.

2. Purchase Price Allocation: Working with the Valuation Team

The fair value measurements underlying a purchase price allocation are performed by valuation specialists. The CAO’s role is not to perform the valuation but to collaborate closely with the valuation team to ensure that assumptions are consistent with management’s operating plans, the population of identified intangible assets is complete and allocations are supportable.

In our experience, the quality of this collaboration is one of the most important factors in whether the purchase accounting will withstand audit scrutiny. Consider this example:

A valuation team proposes a customer-relationship intangible asset based on a multi-period excess earnings method. The CAO should understand:

• Whether the projected financial information, attrition assumptions, operating expense adjustments and returns on contributory assets are internally consistent and supportable from a market-participant perspective.
  
  
• How those assumptions compare with historical experience, industry evidence and relevant market data.

A CAO who has worked across multiple transactions and valuation firms would recognize these patterns; one encountering a purchase price allocation for the first time may not.

3. The Twelve-Month Post-Transaction Review

Acquisition accounting does not end on day one. The measurement period, up to 12 months after the acquisition date, allows the acquirer to adjust provisional fair values as new information comes to light about facts that existed at the acquisition date. There are two important distinctions:

• A measurement period adjustment corrects the day-one balances retroactively, as if the revised information had been available at closing.
  
  
• A subsequent event — for example, new information about conditions that arose after the acquisition date — is recognized in the period it occurs and does not change the opening balance sheet.

Getting the distinction wrong can produce incorrect comparative-period financials.

A structured review process — such as quarterly check-ins with the valuation team and the external auditor — along with a running log of open items and a formal close-out at the 12-month mark will all help keep the accounting, audit and integration teams aligned.

4. The Integration Context

Purchase accounting does not occur in a vacuum. It unfolds alongside the operational integration of the combined entity. This includes the merging of departments, functions and systems. The CAO must understand this broader context because it directly affects the accounting. Consider the following:

• Changes in organizational structure may trigger the need to reassess reporting units for purposes of ongoing goodwill impairment testing.
  • This is a separate exercise governed by the impairment guidance, distinct from the integration itself but often prompted by it.
    
    
• Accounting policies must be harmonized across legacy entities.
  
  
• System configurations must be updated to reflect new account structures and posting logic.

Accounting advisory and integration are separate workstreams, but they are deeply interdependent. In our experience, organizations that coordinate them with shared timelines, joint status meetings and clear handoffs are better positioned to emerge from a transaction with reliable financial information, an intact close process and fewer surprises during audit, lender reporting or buyer diligence.

A Note on AI and Change Leadership

Artificial intelligence (AI) can accelerate parts of accounting work, including accounting and reporting for strategic events. AI would be well leveraged to help us summarize contracts, organize due diligence materials, compare draft schedules to source documents, prepare initial workpaper shells and assist with disclosure drafting.

While we acknowledge that, we caution that AI should never be positioned to make the accounting judgment or replace the review of experienced practitioners. The responsible posture is to use AI to improve speed and completeness while relying on experienced people to validate facts, assess guidance, evaluate alternatives, document conclusions and decide the outcome.

Further, integrating a target into an organization can be a significant change initiative. The professionals leading these initiatives should expect a range of responses to change, including change champions, change-tolerant colleagues and change detractors. Successful change initiatives focus on building coalitions, learning from skeptical voices and investing in training.

Full Circle: Accounting Memos, Policies and Controls

The conclusions reached during a strategic transaction become the basis for new accounting memoranda. Those memos can drive accounting policy updates. Those policies strengthen the control environment. As a result, the next transaction, whenever it arrives, can land on firmer ground.

This is the cycle we described at the beginning of this series: routine operations and strategic transactions reinforcing each other, with each pass through the cycle building a more resilient accounting infrastructure.

In our work, we have seen this cycle operate across organizations at various stages and in different industries. Organizations that document their accounting judgments, embed them in policies, key business processes, and accounting controls and apply them under pressure — are better positioned to protect transaction value, improve audit readiness and grow value over time.

A practical next step is a CAO readiness assessment: a focused review of your organization’s accounting judgments, memo archive, policy framework, control environment, audit-readiness support and transaction-readiness needs.

Contact Us

For questions about outsourced accounting services, including CAO solutions or to discuss a CAO-readiness assessment, please contact your PKF O’Connor Davies client service team or:

Roman Z. Matatov, CPA, FPAC, FMVA, CGMA, CITP, CVA, CFE, CFF
Partner
rmatatov@pkfod.com

Michael Curtiss, CPA
Partner
mcurtiss@pkfod.com

Noam Hirschberger, CFA, CVA
Partner
nhirschberger@pkfod.com

Patrick R. O’Beirne, CPA
Partner
pobeirne@pkfod.com

Kimberley A. Train, CPA
Partner
ktrain@pkfod.com

Michael D. Mekler, CPA
Director
mmekler@pkfod.com

Kapil Rajgor, CPA
Director
kraigor@pkfod.com

Anthony Capobianco, CPA
Director
acapobianco@pkfod.com

Next in this series: Sixty Days to Close: Uniting Strategy and Accounting. The article reviews accounting for strategic transactions, including day-one advisory, purchase price allocation, the twelve-month review, integration and value protection.

For example, applicable guidance may include the guidance for revenue recognition, business acquisitions and asset acquisitions, joint venture formations, divestitures or discontinued operations, consolidation or variable interest entity assessments, restructurings, impairments, debt or equity modifications and any related income tax accounting.